Editorial Policy

How I Test

My testing approach prioritizes consistency over speed. A single use tells you almost nothing — the first week often tells a flattering story that weeks three and four quietly contradict. Nothing gets reviewed until it has been part of a daily routine long enough to see past the novelty effect.

Every morning before coffee: a short log. Word recall, processing speed in the first hour, effort required for routine tasks. Same format, same time of day, every day of the testing window — the discipline that makes data comparable across products and across months. Cost-per-day gets tracked alongside the subjective entries. If something costs more than a decent lunch per day and produces no consistent signal I can distinguish from background noise over a full testing window, it goes in the rejected tab. The rejected tab currently has eighteen entries. I consider that a sign the method is working.

Affiliate Relationships

Some links here are affiliate links. Click one, buy the thing, I get a small cut — at no extra cost to you. The commission doesn't shape which products end up reviewed here. If a product turns out to be junk, the review says it's junk. Eighteen entries in the rejected tab, zero of them paid to be there.

Limitations

Everything here reflects one person's direct experience and personal observation. Not medical, financial, or legal advice. Before acting on anything I write — particularly anything that affects your health — talk to a qualified professional who knows your specific situation. I'm a retired accountant. Useful for the cost math and tracking methodology. Not a clinician, and not pretending to be one.

Get in Touch

For questions, corrections, or feedback, see the contact page.